Soap Opera Discussion Groups and Forums

As The World Turns Discussion Group

Topic: Janet's obsession with two beers


Topic Posted by: MartyB
Date Posted: Wed Oct 28 10:28:14 2009
Additional Comments: Finally Jack laced into Janet & explained to her that he was not impaired & he gave a clear & concise reason to that end. He shut her up. I just wish he had told her to shut up in the hospital as well. I'm just waiting for the moment when Jack confronts Janet on her knowledge of "Uncle Ralphie". Let's see how she responds? TPTB better have that conversation because if they don't I will be pissed off. So far Janet's been awfully muted on the subject of Uncle Ralphie. Where's the rage & the resentment &  anger towards him? Maybe Janet can rememeber the good old days with Uncle Ralphie like she did with Brad on the football field?



Add a MessageGuidelinesTopics ListHomeOther SoapsDaily Recaps for the Show!Registration
Posted by: dandyfop
Date posted: Thu Oct 29 17:58:57 2009
Message:
I am sure the point is- Even Jack wonders if he was impaired and what part that played in his judgment at the moment of crisis. Would it have made any difference if he hadn't had a couple of beers beforehand or would he have done the same thing? They did not make the point of placing Jack in a bar- ordering another beer and Janet commenting on his drinking right before the shooting for nothing.

Respond to this message


Posted by: MaryHatch
Date posted: Wed Oct 28 13:13:28 2009
Message:

First of all, I do think Jack was wrong not to tell Margo about the drinking right away. God knows he has been in this kind of situation before, and he knows that it's the cover-up that is always worse than the "crime." Would the hypocrite Margo have gone all "by the book" on him? Sure, probably, at first. But Margo adores Jack almost to the point of worship, and I do believe she would have been at least fair with him in the end.

Having said that, YES, Janet is the LAST person who should be calling Jack out on this. The very first introduction we had to this woman was very possibily a crime-- that of completely neglecting a minor child who had run away. Back then, Janet couldn't be bothered to answer her phone when she knew her teenage daughter was alone and quite possibly in danger. Now, I'm supposed to believe she's all about honesty and "doing the right thing" and praying to the Virgin Mother with her life-giving udders flopped over the back of a pew. 

No. I will never buy it.

Replies: (list all replies)

  • *with her life-giving udders flopped over the back of a pew* That will no doubt be my best laff of the week. Thanks! eom/D
  • You're quite welcome, D.! eom MaryHatch
  • That was my laugh of the week too. In fact, I had to call my mom and tell her about it. Good one, MH! Tammy518
  • LMAO, MH!! Roxie

    Respond to this message


    Posted by: Mandi
    Date posted: Wed Oct 28 12:57:57 2009
    Message:
    Janet's obsession is with the fact that Jack wasn't completely honest. The only time he is permitted to lie about something illegal that may have happened is when it benefits her. Don't you realize that now Janet is now the most wholesome, upstanding person in Oakdale? RME

    Respond to this message


    Posted by: ita, if the writers wanted to show Jack getting really drunk then the writers should have Showed him getting really drunk . It would have made more sense. And more believable that he would just open fire with a pregnant women around. Just my honest opinion.
    Date posted: Wed Oct 28 12:02:20 2009
    Message:
    cupcake

    Respond to this message


    Posted by: Linny
    Date posted: Wed Oct 28 11:58:29 2009
    Message:
    Marty, I am still of the opinion that Janet knew or should have known that Uncle Ralph wasn't legit. Otherwise, I have no idea why she'd send a complete strange whose gig is in construction to two other complete strangers to "talk" to them about an adoption. Also, her utter lack of surprise, shame, guilt and remorse for allowing such a monster into the life of her daughter and her family AFTER all has been revealed is speaking volumes. I'm not in agreement that Janet's "busy" comforting others because it appears that even now she seems to be thinking more about herself and how others reactions will affect her than much else. Her obsession with this beer issue, although valid, is wildly out of place right now and surprisingly out of character for a woman who at least once asked her husband to hide evidence in the attempted manslaughter of a teenager by his brother.

    We are likely never going to see the a scene where she laments her supposed self-induced ignorance about Uncle Ralphie. Most decent people would feel this, but not Janet. And I don't get the whole "Well she was a teen when she last saw him" argument. If that is the case, why put your faith and the outcome of something as important as the adoption of your daughter's unborn child in the hands of a virtual stranger? Moreover, if Janet was 18 when she last saw this thug, that would be old enough to know something wasn't right with the dude. 18 isn't 8.

    Suffice to say that Janet will never be called on her blind association with Uncle Ralphie, if that is indeed what it was.

    Replies: (list all replies)

  • Bingo, Great post!
  • Linny, I could not agree more. An 18 year old, especially one as worldly as Juicy Janet, would most likely pick up on something being not quite right about good old Uncle Ralphie. I believe she had some idea he worked outside the law, or she wouldn't have used him in in the manner she did. She is an incredibly stupid woman, but she's sneaky and manipulative enough to know how to use just the right resources to get what she wants. (eom) Mandi
  • Linny I have to disagree with you here. Just because you haven't viewed the scenes means that Janet is complicit in her knowlege of Uncle Ralphie. All too often we mention beats in a storyline that the writers have missed. I think you are giving too much credit to the writers for scenes or dialogue they haven't written.
  • Oh...don't get me wrong. I don't think Janet has any idea that Ralph was capable of doing THIS to HER family. I just think that the woman knew or should have known that something wasn't right about a man who is into ''construction'' being able to handle the details of an adoption by sending him over to two complete strangers' house to ''talk'' to them. Who in the right mind would think that Uncle Ralph was the man for that job? Sure he's good to phone the attorney, but to ''negotiate'' an adoption with a stranger? Nah....I think she knew that Ralph would ''lean'' on Pemily because he's a bit of a thug. Others disagree, and I understand that. But from where I'm sitting, all I see is a woman who relied on ''Uncle Ralphie'' to ''settle'' things with Pemily rather than got to another attorney, social services or even CPS given that Pemily have a criminal history. eom Linny

    Respond to this message


    Posted by: dolphina
    Date posted: Wed Oct 28 11:36:29 2009
    Message:
    I just love it when viewers make up their own "facts" about the show to suit their own preferences. You've evidently decided that Jack drank TWO beers, and you're stating it as a "fact." Never mind that the show is telling us something different... you've decided it was TWO, so that's what it was.

    Yesterday Jack said to Janet that he had "a couple" of beers (verbiage people always use when trying to downplay the actual number), and Janet replied "It was more than a couple." Jack didn't argue with her. And really, even if he DID only have TWO beers, that's not what Janet is "obsessed" about... because she BELIEVES he had more than that.

    I've got money that says it will eventually be made clear(er) to us that 1) Jack had more than TWO beers, and 2) Janet had no clue what the score was about Ralph. I have to wonder if you'll still be posting about Jack's TWO beers and Janet's prior knowledge of Uncle Ralphie, as though those things were indisputable facts.

    By the way, if it turns out that I'm the one who's mistaken, I WILL admit it.

    Replies: (list all replies)

  • it was stated that Jack had a couple of beers. What is a couple? 8, 10, 12? Janet saw Jack order another beer not knowing if he had one or two or ten before that. It was stated very clearly that Jack was not impaired & that he handled the situation in the only way that he could have. Janet's insistence on this issue strikes me as very odd considering that this same woman destroyed evidence before this & her reaction at finding out that Uncle Ralphie was responsible for the death of Brad. You don't find that a little bid odd? I guess I'm just a little jaded on Janet's lack of knowledge on who or what Ralphie was. Marty
  • When I use the word couple, I mean two and no more. If I mean to imply any more than two, but still want to convey a relatively small number, I tend to use the word few. That's why I am interpreting Jack's comment to mean he consumed two beers. (eom) Mandi
  • Fact? Couple means two.
  • It was stated very clearly that Jack was not impaired? By whom?/mm
  • Of course *a couple* properly means two. Is there really anyone who's never heard the words *a couple of drinks* used when the speaker wasn't counting at all, let alone specifically counting to two? Please. eom/D
  • mm, it was stated very clearly that Jack wasn't impaired...... by Jack! eom/D

    Respond to this message


    Posted by: Mrs. B. Harris
    Date posted: Wed Oct 28 11:23:39 2009
    Message:

    How many people in America have been ticketed for DIU when all they'd had were a couple of beers and didn't feel the least bit drunk? You don't have to be falling down drunk or even that tipsy to be legally over the limit to drive a vehicle. If Jack was too impaired to drive, it's not out of the question that he was too impaired to make the right decisions in that warehouse. He fired into the dark without knowing if Ralph was using Katie or as it turned out, Brad as a shield. Margo called it a clean shoot, but I don't think so.

    That being said, I've seen Jack be much stupider when he was stone cold sober.

     

    Replies: (list all replies)

  • I feel that Jack was impaired..not drunk, but definitely impaired. The point about people getting a DUI and not being *drunk*, to me, makes the point..he didn't object when JJ insisted on driving because he knew he was impaired.**

    Respond to this message


    Posted by: Krissy
    Date posted: Wed Oct 28 10:55:05 2009
    Message:
    Maybe it's just me, but I can't see how the beers come into play here. It's like Jack said; Ralph was holding Brad IN FRONT OF HIM.. he shot at Jack, so Jack shot back. I think any cop would have done that. I understand that he should never have gone there after drinking, but I think this could have happened beers or no beers. Janet just needs to shut up. Jack should have said something to Margo, but it's not Janet's place to harp on him about it. I bet she'll shut up real fast if he loses his job, and their only source of income would be her hours at the diner. Maybe then she'll finish a full shift.

    Replies: (list all replies)

  • Even if Jack loses his job, Janet doesn't have to worry about having a roof over her head. After all, she's taken over Emma's farmhouse. Hell, I bet Meg had to ask the heifer permission to stay there. (eom) Mandi
  • Very true, Mandi. I seriously hope Emma will be there the next time Janet tells someone to get out of HER house. Ooh what I would do to see Emma lay into her about that!!! Honestly I don't even think Meg or Holden or Jack ever called it THEIR house; and they're FAMILY!
  • I don't think ''any cop'' would have done the same thing. I certainly hope not anyway. The smart thing would have been to take cover and assess the situattion./mm

    Respond to this message


    Posted by: Miss Marple
    Date posted: Wed Oct 28 10:42:12 2009
    Message:
    Ahhh, but good old honest, "by-the-book" Jack has feet of clay.  It turns out he is somewhat less than truthful, shoots before he thinks and becomes angry when confronted.  Hmmmm, I guess Mr. Perfect can't be so judgemental with Carly anymore. She at least admits to her faults.

    Replies: (list all replies)

  • I'm just curious as how the two beers he had impacted anything that went down with Brad? None. There is no issue here. If your a Jack hater then this is something to hold onto. As for Carly's alcoholism & Jack's attitude towards her I never thought he was looking down on her but confronted her when he needed to. Of course he was lied to by Carly, Craig & Parker as to the extent of it. Even his beloved Janet said he was overreacting to Carly's drinking because he just couldn't let go of her? There is no feet of clay here. Jack is the least culpable person in Brad's death. Marty
  • I am not a Jack hater, I am a realist. Actually, I look forward to a Jack & Carly reunion, if as promised it is a different relationship. 1 beer/2 beers/a couple is not the issue. He was not truthful. He knew there was a hostage, and he fired into a dark building and killed his brother. He could have killed Katie, he didn't know where she was. Why the rush to return fire. Why not take cover and wait for assistance? I know what a couple of beers can do, probably on an empty stomach. False courage, feelings of invincibility, hero complex to name a few. There is plenty of blame to go around and lots of people share in the *cluster* but Jack pulled the trigger and should accept responsibility. When I mentioned Jack's previous critical and judgemental treatment of Carly, I did not specifically refer to the alcoholism, but to their entire past relationship./MissM
  • I guess if you don't agree with Marty you have to be a Jack hater. LOL. For myself, I don't really feel it's that healthy to get so emotionally involved with a soap opera character that you hate them. Or worship them either, for that matter./mm
  • thanks, both you mm/MM ladies, for being rational. Marty seems to be of the opinion that anyone who even discusses Jack with any kind of objectivity must be a *Jack hater* who needs something to *hold onto.* I really doubt anyone else cares one way or the other about Jack to the extent Marty does. Jack was the shooter, who inexplicably feels the need to LIE (by omission) about drinking prior to the event, yet he's the LEAST culpable? If you keep working at this, Marty, you might be able to conjure up a way to blame Craig for Brad's death. Hey, that's the ticket! Craig gave Teri a job..... Teri is a link to Ralph.... IT MUST BE CRAIG'S FAULT!! You're welcome, Marty! LOL eom/D
  • Clever observation D. Maybe that's why previews show Jack holding a gun or Craig, I can't think of any other reason, unless he's loosing his mind, a definite possibility./MissM

    Respond to this message


    Add a MessageGuidelinesTopics ListHomeOther SoapsDaily Recaps for the Show!Registration