Topic Posted by: KB
Date Posted: Fri Nov 13 1:21:33 2009
Additional Comments:
Charlotte Ramsey is now being referred to as the one who "put Katherine's baby up for adoption."
Whether or not that's true, wasn't Charlotte first located back in '03 (and believed to be Jill's bio mom) because it was her name on Jill's birth certificate?? Are they not going to mention this at all?
Posted by: TAB Date posted: Fri Nov 13 18:22:36 2009
Message: This has really been bugging me ever since the undid Katherine and Jill being mother and daughter. Why was Charlotte Ramsey's name on Jill's birth certificate? And if Katherine isn't Jill's mother, then who was? There's a good story here somewhere and they aren't bothering to tell it.
Posted by: Cretos Date posted: Fri Nov 13 17:44:36 2009
Message: Also, Billy said Kay has ALWAYS been his grandma which is not true. When he was about to marry Mac he didn't think Kay was his grandma!
Posted by: jMarieSmall Date posted: Fri Nov 13 9:33:42 2009
Message: Charlotte took the baby and gave it to the Fosters...At least that was
way it used to be! Kay never saw her baby..that's why they may
rewrite that she had a boy and not a girl. Which I am not believing BTW.
Posted by: VeeJay Date posted: Fri Nov 13 6:38:05 2009
Message:
Well, it was Charlotte who dropped Jill off at the hospital, and, back then, you had to give a name for the birth certificate; Charlotte gave hers to (supposedly) protect Katherine. Now with the rewrite (which these writers are horrible at doing), they would be better off not addressing that at all.
On another inconsistency, the Judge was supposed to be Jill's daddy. Is he now going to be the father of the new daughter?